| 1. | 5/23/2008 5:08:00 PM | The membership would become less family oriented |
| 2. | 5/24/2008 12:15:00 AM | Changing the current membership structure, in order to be fair, would require some "policing" on the part of the staff. My concern is that this would not be done and there would be abuse. Are we prepared to have that "policing" be part of the staff's responsibilities? |
| 3. | 5/26/2008 11:49:00 AM | "Varisty" memberships for empty-nesters. Maybe we already have that? |
| 4. | 6/2/2008 11:40:00 PM | people should be charged by family size, currently a famliy with one child pays the same as a family with 5 children |
| 5. | 6/4/2008 10:05:00 PM | i think there should be something that if a family has been a member for a long time and only one child is left to finish out swim team and pay less. It could seem as if the family were stilll members if if only one child is using the club. |
| 6. | 6/8/2008 2:06:00 AM | If you did this, how would you monitor the people coming in and out? |
| 7. | 6/11/2008 12:17:00 AM | I think that breaking people into categories will hurt the feel of the club - how will this be enforced? I also like the fact that the club encourages tennis, as opposed to feeling like I have to pay 'extra' for it, which I would feel like I was doing if there was a 'swim only' option. |
| 8. | 6/17/2008 8:18:00 PM | These additional membership programs would have to be enforced to be fair to the families who are paying for a full membership. So far this summer, I have noticed a steady flow of nonmember children and a few adults walking and riding bikes down the driveway and around the parking lot or continuing through to Blaisdell Road as I expect they do during the off season. These people are adding to an already congested parking area. When the club is in operation from Memorial Day - Labor Day, I strongly suggest signs at the entrances indicating the CS&T property is for members and their guests. |
| 9. | 6/23/2008 1:54:00 AM | I do not feel the logistics of managing multiple options is worth the effort. The August only membership may benefit the Club if it is offered to 10-15 families that are at the top of the waiting list. Certainly the month of August is a much slower time in terms of population at the club, so I do not feel it will have a negative impact to the overall club experience. |
| 10. | 6/28/2008 2:41:00 PM | The club membership, as it is now organized, fairly supports all programs for all members. |
| 11. | 7/6/2008 6:30:00 AM | Offering memberships like those listed above would attract people who would not have a vested interest in CST because they or their child would only use the club for one purpose. The fabulous thing about CST is that the members are fully vested and love the club. Not everyone takes advantage of all the activites that are offered. We are all owners and take pride in CST. |
| 12. | 7/14/2008 3:44:00 AM | I feel that this concept is most practical at an indoor facility where there is also monitoring taking place at the front desk as people enter the club. |
| 13. | 7/15/2008 10:45:00 PM | Keep membership as-is; we just increased the # of families; don't overpopulate. |